Showing posts with label rate hikes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rate hikes. Show all posts

Friday, July 8, 2011

Aqua Texas Makes Magical Offer

Aqua Texas Makes Magical Offer

                                           - or -

How to Fix Your System for Free, Save 80 Megagallons and Make $$$$$ in the Process
 

One thing about Aqua-Texas, Inc. (ATI) that has angered more people out here in the “Cedar Barrens” besides their excessive water/sewer bills, is their wasting of our groundwater water in the City of Woodcreek and Woodcreek North. Almost half of the water that ATI pumps up from the Trinity Aquifer is lost or wasted by leaks in their pipes and lines.


The amount of our precious groundwater from the Trinity aquifer that they waste has been documented at 80,000,000 gallons per year. To put that amount into perspective; it could supply the water needs of about 2000 homes and families for an entire year.

The government agency with the proper jurisdiction over ATI’s pumping is the Hays Trinity Groundwater District (HTGCD). The former Board was ineffective in dealing with ATI even though the leaks are a violation of Texas water laws. Just recently, the newly elected Board's President, Jimmy Skipton made a heroic but uncertain move in the right direction. Skipton is finding out that many obstacles still exist and tempers are on a hair trigger. Communication is difficult when emotions are so high.

At the November 18, 2010 Board meeting of the HTGCD, it was announced that ATI has made an “offer” to fix their leaks. The large crowd of citizens was deservedly suspicious but listened to the thing unfold. President Skipton did a fairly credible job of presenting the “offer”, but nothing was presented to the public in writing.


ATI’s “offer” is that they will fix the leaks that they estimate to cost about $5 million, which they will pay for. In return they want to hold onto the rights to and the 80 million gallons of water they were previously allowing to leak into the ground, for future system expansion. Now for the punch line, ATI will recoup its $5 million “investment” by opening a Rate Case with the TCEQ so they can bill their customers for the full amount over some 5 years or so. Aqua couldn't or wouldn't say how much it would cost per household.
They haven’t done squat since 2003. Why have they waited all these years and now you want to deal, what could be the reason?” Could it be that they see more development potential (The Ridge at Wimberley Springs) and know they have no chance for and increase in pumping due to the public outcry over their 80 million gallon/yr. loss of groundwater. Over the past 7 years that works out to 560 million gallons. Being able to keep the pumping of 80 million gallons/year is a way of increasing their pumping potential without asking the HTGCD for more pumping. It will probably stop the leaks but it goes without saying that no water will be saved, it will be sold. It is important to note that they could still waste as much 15% of their total pumping (aprox. 25 Megagallons per year.) 

12/4 Update: I have learned directly from ATI that the proposed plan would include a requested 3-year pumping permit with no increase in the amount of water pumped. They will repair the leaks to comply with Rule #9 (15% Loss) at an estimated $5 million total cost for both Woodcreeks. And best of all, they want to keep the 80 Megagallons to sell. They will open a Rate Case before the TCEQ to recover that amount from their Customers. They expect the process to take about 5 years. I suspect much longer ;)

The exact amount expected to be paid by the citizens for the repairs will be somewhat complex due to the differences between the rate structures of the two Woodcreeks. This will necessarily be a separate process for each entity. The City of Woodcreek (phase I) is on a negotiated rate structure that allows them to have a slightly lower base rate for water and wastewater service. Woodcreek North (phase II), being an unincorporated subdivision has a rate structure based on a previously granted Southwest Regionalization.

 Note: The following Values and Calculations are not spelled out in
The ATI "Offer" and are therefore my guestimates.

Since the TCEQ allows ATI to directly recover their costs for Capital Improvements by billing their customers, there are significant differences as to what the customers in two Woodcreeks would pay. Using approximate values, let’s say that both the City of Woodcreek and Woodcreek North each have 800 customers. If ATI spends $2.5 million on Capital Improvements (repairs) in the City of Woodcreek (Phase I), each customer would be on the hook for an astounding $3125 or an unaffordable rate increase of $52.08 per month over 5 years.

If a similar $2.5 million were spent in Woodcreek North (phase II), each customer in the Southwest Region of 13,000 customers would have to pay $192.31. Spread out over about 5 years, that is an increase of $3.21 per month. You can see that while the City of Woodcreek has ‘enjoyed’ slightly cheaper utility bills for the last few years, they will be at a distinct financial disadvantage when leaks are repaired. They will likely have to renegotiate their rates and become part of the SW Region or try and secure an injunction via court action.  The City could eventually try an acquisition of the system by eminent domain. All of their options will be very expensive and fraught with risk.

These charges will not likely show up in bills for at least a year, as they and can only be billed after the repairs or sections of repairs are completed and approved by the TCEQ.  

Our neighbors in Kerrville and elsewhere within the Southwest Region would also see rate increases as part of the shared costs within the Southwes Region. While this is legally right, it seems MORALLY WRONG.

These leaks have been present since at least 2003 when Aqua America Inc. (know then as "Philadelphia Suburban Corp.") purchased the system from AquaSource. In the previous seven years Aqua has done nothing to fix their leaks. No one has been able to force them to fix their leaky system and they certainly have not volunteered to do so. ATI bought a “pig in a poke” and failed to check the “pig”. Now they want their customers to pay for their lack of due diligence.


Woodcreek Residents were a bit unhappy with the "Offer"


The crowd did not find the "offer" very palatable and some like myself voiced their concerns. President Skipton and other Board members seemed a little surprised at the intensity of the objections, but they should have known that it wasn't going to go down easy. No one on the Board is a customer of the infamous Aqua-Texas Incorporated but many in the audience obviously were. Hays County Commissioner Will Conley was there and did speak but his words were a little superficial as you would expect from a politician not wanting to incur the wrath of his constituents. This is a very touchy subject for the property owners in the Woodcreeks. Some talk about a committees or citizens groups to work on this near impossible situation was mentioned but no firm plans were revealed.

 
If this entire proposal is approved and executed,

Aqua Texas a.k.a. Aqua Utilities will have;

  • an additional 80 million free gallons of water/year to sell.

  • enhanced sales potential due to more a favorable climate for additional development.

  • fixed their leaky system substantially increasing its value, at no cost to them.

  • the HTGCD, TCEQ and the Public will be off of its back for wasting water.

  • a 3-year uninterupted pumping permit to allow for increased expansion and contracting.

The Customers will have;

  • increased water/sewer bills.

  • some further lowering of their property values.

  • knowledge that most of the 80 million gallon leaks have stopped however, now ATI can sell the water and gain increased revenues.

  • increased development in the area, therefore more pressure on the aquifers.

  • construction inconveniences and water interruptions for about 5 years

  • no guarantee that Aqua will not ask for further rate increases during their 3-year permit period.



 

Although I feel that everything here is true, it is the responsibility of the reader to do his or her own research before arriving at their own conclusions about the veracity of any statement(s) herein. Everything contained within these pages is protected speech guaranteed by the United States Constitution. So There!

Aqua Texas Reviews from The Wimberley Valley Online


Excerpted from the “Merchant Circle” Website (unedited)


Bigger Problem than high water bills

"While the extraordinarily high water bills are a major problem with Aqua TX, one must really take into account that the bigger underlying issue is that Aqua TX has such a bad reputation in the Hill Country that it is ruining the property values of the local homeowners. I decided to sell my home in Woodcreek because of Aqua TX. It finally sold after listing it several times over several years, but I had to sell it for quite a bit less than I paid because of Aqua TX. I had five potential buyers in the past 6 months who wanted the house, but after reviewing the information about Aqua TX, decided to buy elsewhere to avoid the high cost of water with Aqua TX. I was lucky to find a buyer willing to go ahead with the purchase in spite of Aqua TX, but you can bet I will make certain Aqua TX is no where near any neighborhood I buy into in the future. I am sorry for those of you who are stuck with them and wish you the best in ousting that vermin from our State. Aqua TX is horrible!!!"

April 27, 2010 by Alana Scott in Wimberley, TX 


AQUA SUCKS!!!!

"I recently moved to the Woodcreek North area in Wimberley and I can not believe that my water bill is $130 before I use ANY WATER!This is RAPE!I work my ass to provide for my family and NOW what am I supposed to do,go on welfare because I am spending more $ on water.I'd like to know what "improvements" Aqua has made here,because the water taste like shit and it smells like wet dog,it's not my home because I don't own dogs!I just can't believe that this is legal.All I know is that it is pretty sad when I have to pay these outrageous prices for water and I don't even use that much in my home. What's even worse is that we as Aqua customers have to pay to pay our bill on line or by phone. All I have to say is there has to be a way around this RAPE of TX residents through this water company who is based on the EAST COAST,they are not even local.Why can't we use the same water company that Woodcreek South uses?How can they make us pay these outrageous amounts.This is BULLSHIT in TRUE FORM"

March 05, 2009 by Sen in Wimberley, TX


Aqua Texas - RIP OFF!

"We have Aqua Texas out here in wimberley for sewage and water. I have never in my life felt so enraged about getting ripped off for a service. Our base water is $40 before we even use a drop and the sewage is $90! I live in a 1200 sq ft condo with no yard and am paying the same water rates that the people who own large homes and big lots that use 4 to 5 times as much water as i do. I wish there was a way to burn their sorry asses into the ground and take them for everything they have, so that they know what it feels like! They say they have made improvements, but their have been none. They run the sewage for thousands of people on a 2" pipe, when they should be on a 10" or 12". PEC was exposed out here and paid dearly for it, its been long past due for Aqua Texas to have their actions paid for. DAMN TO AQUA TEXAS!"

January 23, 2009 by Matt in Wimberley, TX

Monday, January 17, 2011

Aqua-Texas Inc. Exposé


Be Careful What You Wish For

When we moved to the Wimberley Valley in the summer of 2008 we were not prepared for, nor had we ever heard of a Water War. Like many Americans we were used to turning on the tap and receiving clean plentiful water from the cities we lived in. We moved here after living in Colorado Springs for 22 years, where we irrigated about ¼ acre of a beautiful Kentucky Bluegrass lawn, washed our cars and even used the water to sweep our driveway and sidewalks. I always felt a little guilty about some of that water use or misuse but there seemed to be an unlimited supply and we were paying for it. The population of Colorado Springs was rapidly growing and we were just beginning to see the effects of water shortages. The city instituted water rationing and everybody complied; so well in fact that the City complained that they lost revenue so the raised or rates. We felt we had been robbed; little did we know.

The water we received was sweet, clean, clear and soft, being from snowmelt that flowed down from the nearby Rockies. Our water bills ran around $30 per month with an occasional summertime bump to $50. Yes, we were wasteful and spoiled!

Having lived most of my early life in Texas; I knew we would have to adjust to some differences here, some more subtle than others. Both my Wife and I are retired and we expected to live out our days in the relative peace and quite of the Texas hill country. We really believed that. Deep in the dark recess of my memory I recalled an old saying, “Whisky is fer Drinkin ... Water is fer Fightin". I have often thought of that phrase in the last two years. Another old saying which I remembered was, “Be careful what you wish for”; it was to haunt me later on

After settling in, our first negative experience with water was when we received or water/sewer bill from Aqua Texas. The bill was about $170 and we attempted to call the company and protest, with no success. After asking around the neighborhood we found that our bill was typical and maybe a little low for the area. To make things even worse Texas was in the throws of record setting drought and everybody was saying to conserve water. We figured that conserving water would be the right thing to do morally and would make our water bill shrink as well. To our surprise and horror our bill stayed the about same since the ATI bill was comprised mostly of “Base Facility Charges” and “Deferred Capital Expenses Surcharges” amounting to about $150 per month. The actual water only cost about $10 for 2700 gallons. So, no matter how much water we used or didn’t use we would still have to pay at least the $150 per month. That way ATI makes a ton of money even if a drought condition exists and they have to enforce water rationing. Where I come from that would be called a scam! I was told this is not a scam; it’s just Texas politics as usual. Damn The TCEQ!
 

Nothing about this encouraged conserving the water, which I thought was important; apparently Aqua Texas doesn't care. It looked like we were sunk! We began to attend just about every meeting of every organization in the valley that might have a stake in the water situation. We met as many people as we could even some politicians and some real nutcases (in some instances they were the same people). We quickly found that there were various factions in the area, all concerned about water. These factions ran from the “true believers” that ‘walk the walk’ and ‘live the life’ of conservation on all fronts, to the “deniers” that believe that we will never run out of any natural resource especially water. We listened to all sides and learned a lot.

We were surprised to find that several people had converted over to rainwater harvesting for all of their home use since that practice had been outlawed in Colorado. That State claims to own the water that falls on your property and you are not allowed to interfere with it. You can’t even use a 50-gallon rain barrel. Likewise, graywater recycling is strictly controlled rendering it all but forbidden. So far Texas has not caught on to outlawing the collection of rainwater or taxing it. If it were to become widespread, the Texas Legislature and our local governments might take notice. Wouldn’t it be ironic if rainwater harvesting were to be blamed for interfering with the re-charge of the aquifers therefore requiring regulation? Never underestimate our politicos. That is another quote to live by.


 A smaller group that included those of us who live in the area and was more concerned about the extremely high water/sewer bills. We were beginning to see that although about 1600 people were affected we were unorganized and most of that number was not motivated to act and felt that we were wasting our time. They would rather complain than get involved. Going up against ATI, the TCEQ, the Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District was going to take time, numbers and money. Since we had none of those, we made the decision to mount an attack on ATI over their wasting of aquifer water. CARD was a little extreme in their methods but we appreciated any help we could get but chose not to align to closely with them or join them.

We went forward wishing for the water wasting to end. This was not really a sound method of getting the water bills lowered but it felt good to get even with the enemy, so we lobbied the local groundwater board to do their job and stop the leaks. All through 2009 and the first half of 2010 they didn’t listen or act. When a new Board was elected in April of 2010 we saw hope that our wish might come true.

Finally, we were told by the local groundwater board that ATI was going to present an plan to fix their leaks over the next 5 years. The kicker was that they will bill the customers as provided by Texas law for the work amounting to about $5 million. This is not what we wished for.

As far as conservation is concerned ATI would be allowed to keep the pumping rights to the roughly 80 megagallons/yr. they are now wasting through their leaks. They could use it in any “legal way” such as selling it. That is bound to anger the conservationists as it does me.

We must stop wishing and chose between embracing the offer by ATI and paying higher water bills or rejecting the offer and let the leaks continue. In other words our choice is between cost and conservation. What a predicament!

We have therefore decided to let the pipes leak, thinking that ATI will eventually have to fix them on their own, as they get worse or it becomes necessary for increased development in the area.



Those of us in Woodcreek, Texas have already seen our property values plummet as our water bills increased to the point of a financial hardship. We simply can’t take any more costs added to our utility bills and we can’t move out since we are all “under water” on our mortgages. Renters can move but the landlords will likely suffer lack of a cash flow. Many have lowered their rent below their costs to mitigate the impact. Foreclosures are increasing and home are not selling in Woodcreek. Frankly, anyone would be foolish to buy a home here, as we did.

This agreement does nothing for our already overstressed pocket books or the overstressed Trinity Aquifer; it is a win-lose situation that actually makes our predicament much worse. This could be the financial tipping point for a few property owners in The City of Woodcreek and Woodcreek North.
Aqua Texas Makes Magical Offer

If the newest proposals by Aqua Texas are approved and executed,

Aqua Texas will have:

  • an additional 80 million free gallons of water/year to sell.

  • enhanced sales potential due to more a favorable climate for additional development.

  • fixed their leaky system substantially increasing its value, at no cost to them.

  • the Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District, the TCEQ and the Public will be off of its back for wasting water.

  • a 3-year uninterrupted pumping permit to allow for increased expansion and contracting.

The Customers will have:

  • increased water/sewer bills.

  • some further lowering of their property values.

  • knowledge that most of the 80 million gallon leaks have stopped however, now ATI can sell the water and gain increased revenues.

  • increased development in the area, therefore more pressure on the aquifers.

  • construction inconveniences and water interruptions for about 5 years

  • no guarantee that Aqua will not ask for further rate increases during their 3-year permit period.



Although I feel that everything here is proven fact, it is the responsibility of the reader to do his or her own research before arriving at their own conclusions about the veracity of any statement(s) herein. Everything contained within these pages is protected speech guaranteed by the United States Constitution. So There!